The last couple of days have been quite interesting. Two
days ago I worked for 15 hours just to write a two page comparative analysis on
“Cost of Living” in Europe. Almost all of that time was actually just
researching what “cost of living” is and how to implement it in a comparative
analysis. It is quite easy to understand what “cost of living” is by its very
phrase. How much does it cost to live a certain way; that is all it is. But
what about when you are trying to implement a cost of living index for an
entire population, or even more, a group of populations? That’s a pain on a
whole other level. So many variations must be taken into consideration, one
cannot simply calculate a personal expense check-list; said check-list varies
for each person. I certainly do not live the same way as Mr. Donald Trump
(despite my most earnest day-dreams). And Mr. Trump doesn’t live the same way
as the bum sleeping on the street in downtown Manhattan. I took a picture of
said bum as I was exiting the New York Public Library about 2 or 3 in the
afternoon. I was actually envious of the bum, I do love sleeping and it was a
particularly sunny afternoon where sleeping outdoors is one of those rare
delights for the perpetually indoor bum that I am.
With all this in consideration, once again, I ask the
question, how much does it cost to live a certain way for an entire population?
The answer, in a limited way, is the use of a consumer price index (CPI), calculating
the changes in inflation, documenting said fluxuation, and then comparing it
against a certain set of information; this, to some degree, is what I did.
Rather, what I did was to calculate the above mentioned information for the United
Kingdoms and comparing it to Kyrgyzstan. Doing so I found that, no surprise to
those who know much about economics, Kyrgyzstan had a higher rate of inflation.
This is not a negative issues, despite the negative connotation that the term
inflation bares. The United Kingdoms has reached, some 90% of its potential
growth, as such, the United Kingdoms will never see a significantly high
inflation rate. This doesn’t mean that the United Kingdoms will not be more
influenced by a high (for its own set of standards) inflation rate. Rather, it
means that Kyrgyzstan is a young country that has not yet made its stride to
economic growth yet, and because of such the rate of inflation is higher.
This has real significance. If Kyrgyzstan can (at some
point) reach a CPI standard that can compare with the United Kingdoms, it is
conceivable that a country like Kyrgyzstan can see its own potential future.
This is something that isn’t even remotely visible in the near future, but it
certainly isn’t something that cannot happen. What would be really interesting
would be if we could somehow calculate CPI for the United Kingdoms around the
same time in its conception as that of Kyrgyzstan in its current state.
No comments:
Post a Comment